|
Post by LowKey on Sept 22, 2014 19:24:38 GMT
When asked by co-workers what, if any, martial arts I've studied I usually reply that I studied two: "Click-Click-Boom" and the Ancient Scottish Martial Art "Fek-Yu" which involves knocking your opponent down and generally kicking the shit out of them (taught primarily by soccer hooligans).
Seriously, I spent some time learning Akido. Not enough to be a bad ass with it, but it makes weapons retention work seem kinda easy. Add to it my foolish years of barracks brawling, my(dare I say it?) age acquired lack of caring about "the other guy" and I'm downright unpleasant. I'll chew your face off while I'm at it (no bath salts required).
I've also spent time in some less than nice places, often in the wee hours where the only others out there were thugs, hookers, junkies, scam artists, ect. Honestly, I can't recall getting messed with. In retrospect I kinda feel like the underwater cameraman who gets away with repeatedly swimming with sharks.....
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 23, 2014 16:26:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by redeyes on Sept 24, 2014 0:31:20 GMT
This is why I love this forum. We don't have 800 thread about what is the best handgun for bears. We have awesome threads that get awesomer with great posts about body language. Still getting through the first video you posted Browning. Good job man. Learning is occurring.
|
|
|
Post by as556 on Sept 24, 2014 1:28:29 GMT
Not to be a shit talker, but is it me or is that forum unbearably boring and dead lately. The AR thread has like 2 posts this month. I am an AR whore, I must have someone talk to about them! I sure as hell am not joining Arfcom and people on M4C can be snotty little bitches at times.
|
|
|
Post by Gingerbread Man on Sept 24, 2014 1:35:48 GMT
Yes, ARFcom and M4C are the snotty bitches.
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 24, 2014 1:48:45 GMT
This is why I love this forum. We don't have 800 thread about what is the best handgun for bears. We have awesome threads that get awesomer with great posts about body language. Still getting through the first video you posted Browning. Good job man. Learning is occurring. Thanks. This forum is a little tighter knit, the rules are looser and as a result people express themselves a little more freely. I probably never would have put much of that up at that other forum just because of the second guessing that was often involved. Body language is important though. Look at that couple above that were in the tunnel. They were at a club, there was an incident at the club where one or a couple of the guys were hitting on the girl, there was an argument of some sort, they left, the couple walked past the group (after all this having happened) and they were still caught basically unaware after going past a group of pissed off younger 20-something males who'd they'd already had a problem with. If they had of payed attention to the body language that was almost undoubtedly present in both in the club and then after when they went by they probably could have saved themselves some grief. Taken a taxi, had a friend come pick them up from the club or at least been ready. As it was they got ran up on and they were basically caught unaware. Plus the body language part of it plays into the whole psychology thats involved in everyday decision making and social wrangling. That kind of thing interests me even without the fighting. Millions of years of evolution and interacting with each other in regards to social behavior on display. Walking past a (in this case, pissed off) group of teenage or 20-something males who have been drinking or are somehow chemically altered and/or who are looking to prove something to themselves and each other is probably one of the most dangerous situations that most people face as far as personal violence goes. That's not to say that the couple was somehow to blame for what happened, they aren't. That responsibility lies with the members of the group who attacked and beat them, but it would have been better if they realized what was up.
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Sept 24, 2014 2:11:06 GMT
The body language stuff reminds me of an excellent course I had an opportunity to attend when I was a devil-dog. It was about combat profiling (very politically incorrect) and reading a crowd. Good stuff. People are usually easy to read and judging a book by its cover is your first tool in identifying threats.
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 24, 2014 2:31:03 GMT
So what were some of the main ideas of the course in reading a crowd?
I know what to look for in individuals and small groups of people, very little on crowd psychology except for what was in the book 'Among the Thugs' (about soccer hooligans in the UK, but it was very much a book about crowd violence and psychology).
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 24, 2014 2:34:29 GMT
With ARF.com there can be some good info, but you have to generally scroll through 15 pages of penis measuring to get to it. M4C is a bit better, very much a hierarchy at play there but where I don't really know much about the players or understand the dynamics.
|
|
|
Post by omegaman on Sept 24, 2014 12:14:58 GMT
So what were some of the main ideas of the course in reading a crowd? I know what to look for in individuals and small groups of people, very little on crowd psychology except for what was in the book 'Among the Thugs' (about soccer hooligans in the UK, but it was very much a book about crowd violence and psychology). It's been awhile (and I doubt I still have the powerpoint), but the idea is to identify threats and make decisions based on what you know, not necessarily having all the information (I believe the term is "heuristics", check me on that). Basically, the course was an attempt to quantify that "spider sense" when you know something isn't quite jiving--but the enemy has not revealed themselves, yet. The "based on what you know" is the subjective part and where profiling comes in. 18-30 year old Iraqi males, for example, would be the most likely demographic to pose a threat. You see a group while on patrol--what are their actions and body language telling you? Shifty eyes and stances, nervously glancing at a non-descript bag or spot in the road? Clenched jaw, flushed cheeks, overall "tense"? Signs that they might be up to something. So, adjust your decisions accordingly. This does not mean open fire or detain them, but just adjust the patrol route according and make yourself a "hard target". In the military, it is easy to get caught up in "this is the route, stay on course"--combat profiling is a tool that reinforces to that squad leader his ability to make quick decisions and call audibles. It goes the other way, too. Is said group of 18-30 year old Iraqi males engaged in casual conversation? Not paying much attention to you at all? Very possible they are just talking about a soccer game. Anyway, this all correlates with what you originally said about adjusting yourself and providing angles and deflection from the possible threat. It is not racist to actively avoid a group of young black males. I now profiling is not politically correct--but it works. Statisically, there are demographics in every region that have a higher probability to commit a crime or pose a threat. The idea is to develop a mindset to allow dynamic action that can avoid conflict (or start the process to ready yourself) as oppossed to being stuck in a reactionary frame of mind (this happens, often) and waiting for the other team to act first. Reading a crowd? Look for angry faces...they stand out. Nervous posture, shifty eyes, flushed cheeks, clenched jaws. These are signs of increased adrenaline and an indiviual readying himself for something (conflict, all the fight or flight stuff). Crowds of people act like sheep, which makes it easier to spot the wolves.
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 24, 2014 13:56:49 GMT
Cool, thanks Omega
Basically what I thought, but I wondered if it was culturally specific for the Middle East like looking for suicide bombers with bulky jackets or bags with freshly shaved beards (tan lines), nervous, sweating profusely and that kind of thing.
On it not being PC to identify groups of younger Black males as potentially dangerous I don't think it really matters much. You or I aren't the police and we aren't going to be stopping or arresting anyone based on skin color. There's no official authority there, so in my mind it's not really an issue. I'm just looking to keep me and mine safe, I'm not looking to bother anyone. I imagine your motivation is much the same.
Besides I'd also do my best to avoid a group of thuggy looking younger White guys, Mexican guys, Asian guys or what have you that I just had an issue with in club when they didn't take 'no' for an answer that my girlfriend didn't want to dance or have a drink with them or whatever the issue was.
|
|
|
Post by as556 on Sept 27, 2014 20:40:38 GMT
Good info guys! Keep it coming. Browning those videos you posted are interesting. That first British guy got his ass handed to him by the calm dude. Got a chuckle out of that.
Wish I could contribute more to this thread. Will be reading and learning for now.
|
|
|
Post by redeyes on Sept 28, 2014 4:09:12 GMT
Yeah, I liked that video too. Big guy looked like he had some kind of training. Any of y'all know what kind? Not that it really mattered. Skinny guy didn't really want to fight he just wanted to look tough. Skinny shouldn't have put hands on the big guy.
|
|
|
Post by Gingerbread Man on Sept 28, 2014 14:29:19 GMT
Yeah, I liked that video too. Big guy looked like he had some kind of training. Any of y'all know what kind? Not that it really mattered. Skinny guy didn't really want to fight he just wanted to look tough. Skinny shouldn't have put hands on the big guy. Which video?
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Sept 28, 2014 16:56:56 GMT
Yeah, I liked that video too. Big guy looked like he had some kind of training. Any of y'all know what kind? Not that it really mattered. Skinny guy didn't really want to fight he just wanted to look tough. Skinny shouldn't have put hands on the big guy. Which video? They're talking about this one. Pre-contact cues. You can see the aggressor pumping himself up to make him appear larger, the loud talk, the footwork and the use of wide gestures.
|
|