|
|
Post by Gingerbread Man on Jun 5, 2015 18:19:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nxp on Jun 7, 2015 3:42:46 GMT
If it goes NFA can I put the shoulder thing on it finally? 
|
|
|
|
Post by MrEMonkey on Jun 14, 2015 20:43:12 GMT
After reading the link, and the documents the link linked to, I'm still not seeing how they plan to do this.
I mean, what--anything you could touch to your shoulder--that already covers mare's legs, and I'm sure if you were really thinking about it, you could come up with more. Better not have a pistol-grip only shotgun, just to be safe. Goodbye Thompson Contenders, while we're at it.
Any receiver that could be used to build a rifle? Never mind that we're throwing out any precedent on unbuilt receivers not being either until it's built, you could interpret that to add 1911s and Glocks, pretty much anything you could fit into a mech tech, roni, or any other carbine conversion, right?
At the end of the day, I think this is just an attempt to cow armed citizens into submission. If they tried to change this rule, it would be difficult to enforce, and even more difficult to defend against the inevitable court challenge. So they try to scare us into following a rule that they haven't even attempted to put in place. They win without firing a shot, so to speak.
|
|
|
|
Post by as556 on Jun 16, 2015 9:39:03 GMT
I don't think they're being reclassified, but who knows these days. I want an AR pistol, anyway so Im building one. Also, I wrote the ATF asking if a bare buffer tube can be rested against the body, arm or shoulder when firing. Hope my dog doesn't get shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by as556 on Jun 16, 2015 13:42:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by MrEMonkey on Jun 16, 2015 19:26:43 GMT
Sounds like TTAG actually got this one right.  |
|
