|
Post by NamelessStain on Nov 25, 2013 19:44:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Dec 1, 2013 13:19:38 GMT
Jesus. You see the video? I don't think I'd want to hold that thing (hair dryer/coin and red bull can gun) while it goes off. Looked almost as dangerous to the user as the target.
|
|
|
Post by Gingerbread Man on Dec 1, 2013 15:10:16 GMT
Jesus. You see the video? I don't think I'd want to hold that thing (hair dryer/coin and red bull can gun) while it goes off. Looked almost as dangerous to the user as the target. Well, let's walk that back for the Jihadists in the audience. This really is a boon for them, kill or maim some random person for Jihad and die in the process almost instantaneously? Heck yeah! I'd really like to thank this dood for doing this and showing our knuckle dragging barely literate Jihad homies how to get down for the holidays!
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Dec 1, 2013 15:31:58 GMT
I'm kinda thinking it would just blow their hands and maybe their dick off. Bet you they'd live. They could give them a cell right next to that underwear bomber guy who scorched his junk. Those 72 virgins wouldn't do them much good without junk (unless that somehow gets magically re-attached in paradise). Can't really see Jihadists using this thing. It's destructive, but it's a one shot deal, there's a pretty substantial delay when it's triggered and it's not destructive enough to take out a plane even if the cabin was pressurized.
|
|
|
Post by Gingerbread Man on Dec 1, 2013 16:38:16 GMT
Yea, true. It would give the TSA an excuse to implement stupider regs and rules. Which is a plus. For them.
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Dec 1, 2013 17:15:15 GMT
I can see them becoming more restrictive. Especially considering that they're arming some of them and giving the TSA the powers to arrest.
|
|
|
Post by nxp on Dec 2, 2013 17:50:20 GMT
If they ban RedBull how will we ever get the planes off the ground???!
Give a brillant mind with nothing to do/a penchant for poking the bear a room full of toys and something like this will happen.
I hope none of the TSA watches OZ reruns, next thing you know they'll be keeping my toothbrush.
|
|
|
Post by Browning35 on Dec 2, 2013 19:05:07 GMT
Good point. If prison inmates can make weapons in a max security prison then they're not going to have an issue making them in an airport with with way more resources. Shanks can be made out of any sort of plastic (toothbrushes, hair brushes, Saran Wrap, coffee lids etc), scrap metal (decorative trim, scored out of a sheet metal with the file on fingernail clippers, clothes hangers), a sharpened wooden stake or an improvised club/flail made out of a lock or other heavy object in a sock. Hijackers who belong to an organization will probably just do what they've always done though. One of their members will just get a job as a baggage handler or some other job and they'll plant the weapons on the other side of security check point. That's how most fundamentalist Islamic hijackers got their weapons in Europe, N. Africa and the Middle East during such incidents in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Plus even though the security is much better than it was in the past, reporters and security experts who test the systems in place are still able to get weapons on board without much issue. Lethal weapons smuggled on British plane (*Click*)
|
|
|
Post by scbrian on Dec 2, 2013 19:36:37 GMT
Good point. If prison inmates can make weapons in a max security prison then they're not going to have an issue making them in an airport with with way more resources. Shanks can be made out of any sort of plastic (toothbrushes, hair brushes, Saran Wrap, coffee lids etc), scrap metal (decorative trim, scored out of a sheet metal with the file on fingernail clippers, clothes hangers), a sharpened wooden stake or an improvised club/flail made out of a lock or other heavy object in a sock. Agreed. What constitutes a weapon is only as limited as ones mind. I'm sure GM can jump in and show how to weaponize magazines, newspapers, soda bottles. I know I've used a magazine and surprised the hell outta someone before...
|
|